Human noise blindness drives suboptimal cognitive inference
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Optimal inference with suboptimal models: Addiction and active Bayesian inference
When casting behaviour as active (Bayesian) inference, optimal inference is defined with respect to an agent's beliefs - based on its generative model of the world. This contrasts with normative accounts of choice behaviour, in which optimal actions are considered in relation to the true structure of the environment - as opposed to the agent's beliefs about worldly states (or the task). This di...
متن کاملFluctuating noise drives Brownian transport.
The transport properties of Brownian ratchet were studied in the presence of stochastic intensity noise in both overdamped and underdamped regimes. In the overdamped case, an analytical solution using the matrix-continued fraction method revealed the existence of a maximum current when the noise intensity fluctuates on intermediate timescale regions. Similar effects were observed for the underd...
متن کاملCognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain functional networks.
Effortful cognitive performance is theoretically expected to depend on the formation of a global neuronal workspace. We tested specific predictions of workspace theory, using graph theoretical measures of network topology and physical distance of synchronization, in magnetoencephalographic data recorded from healthy adult volunteers (N = 13) during performance of a working memory task at severa...
متن کاملBayesian causal inference drives temporal sensorimotor recalibration
How does the brain evaluate and represent the time interval between a sensorimotor pair of events like a button press and a flash? Psychophysical experiments have shown that the relative position in time of the two events is subject to contraction (causal/intentional binding) [1] and to adaptive shifts which lead to striking time-ordering reversal illusions (temporal recalibration) [2]. The sub...
متن کاملDiscounting and Conditionalization Dissociable Cognitive Processes in Human Causal Inference
When people are asked to judge the strengths of two potential causes of an effect, they often demonstrate discounting—devaluing the strength of a target cause when it is judged in the presence of a strong (relative to a weak) alternative cause. Devaluing the target cause sometimes results from conditionalization—holding alternative causes constant while evaluating the target cause. Yet discount...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature Communications
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2041-1723
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09330-7